Whilst O’Donnell laudably tried to target the audience’s interest onand hopefully final, Charlie Sheen trainwreck interview, courtesy of the tragic undertow that threatens to pull Sheen under for wonderful, I was overtaken, not from the pulling on the thread, and therefore the voracious audience he serves. It didn’t make me unfortunate, it designed me angry.
On the subject of celebrities, we will be considered a heartless nation, basking in their misfortunes like nude sunbathers at Schadenfreude Beach. The impulse is understandable, to some diploma. It may possibly be grating to listen to complaints from customers who delight in privileges that many of us can not even think of. If you should cannot muster up some compassion for Charlie Sheen, who may make additional income for any day’s perform than the majority of us will make inside of a decade’s time, I guess I cannot blame you.
Along with the quick pace of occasions on the web along with the info revolution sparked from the Internet, it is especially quick for the technological know-how business to imagine it is different: continuously breaking new ground and executing issues that no one has ever performed previous to.
But there are actually other sorts of organization which have previously undergone a lot of the exact radical shifts, and also have just as good a stake in the long term.
Consider healthcare, as an illustration.
We typically believe that of it as a large, lumbering beast, but in truth, medication has undergone a sequence of revolutions from the previous 200 many years which are a minimum of equal to those we see in solutions and material.
Less understandable, but nevertheless within just the norms of human nature, is the impulse to rubberneck, to slow down and investigate the carnage of Charlie spectacle of Sheen’s unraveling, but in the blithe interviewer Sheen’s lifestyle as we pass it within the perfect lane of our every day lives. To be sincere, it could possibly be tough for persons to discern the variation between a run-of-the-mill attention whore, and an honest-to-goodness, circling the drain tragedy-to-be. On its very own merits, a quote like “I Am On the Drug. It’s Termed Charlie Sheen” is sheer genius, and we cannot all be anticipated to take the total measure of someone’s daily life every single time we listen to something amusing.
Speedy forward to 2011 and I'm attempting to take a look at implies of staying a little more business-like about my hobbies (mainly music). By the stop of January I had manned up and commenced to promote my weblogs. I had designed a few completely different weblogs, which were contributed to by pals and colleagues. I promoted these activities due to Facebook and Twitter.
Second: the little abomination that the Gang of Five around the Supream Court gave us a yr or so back (Citizens Inebriated) essentially includes a tad bouncing betty of its very own that could pretty perfectly go off within the faces of Govs Wanker, Sacitch, Krysty, and J.O. Daniels. Considering this ruling extended the principle of “personhood” to the two corporations and unions, to try out to deny them any proper to run within just the legal framework that they have been organized below deprives these “persons” in the freedoms of speech, association and movement. Which suggests (as soon as once again, quoting law school skilled loved ones) that possibly the courts must uphold these rights for the unions (as person “persons” as guaranteed from the Federal (and most state) constitutions, or they have to declare that these attempts at stripping or limiting union rights ought to utilize to important companies, also.
Each day, Inc.'s reporters scour the Web for the most important and interesting news to entrepreneurs. Here's what we found today:
Twitter's sky-high valuation. Is the microblogging start-up really worth $10 billion? The eye-popping figure is being bandied about in Silicon Valley, according to The Wall Street Journal, which reports that both Google and Facebook have engaged in "low-level talks" recently to snap up Twitter. Could such rich valuations—Facebook at $50 billion, Groupon at $6 billion and the Huffington Post at $315 million—lead to another tech bubble? A warning from Ethan Kurzweil of Bessemer Venture Partners: "Are these prices justifiable based on financial multiples? No."
Turning your site into a profit center. Ben Lerer, founder of Thrillist.com and Inc. TV veteran, knows a thing or two about making money off of digital content. After all, Thrillist has millions of subscribers, a devoted following, and, following the recent acquisition of JackThreads.com, a bona-fide commerce arm. In a recent post for OPEN Forum, Lerer discusses the need to monetize your site, even if that means going outside your traditional business model. "In the future, the smartest content companies are going to find ways to leverage their big audience to make money in commerce," Lerer writes. "What those guys would be well-served to think about is how best to otherwise monetize the audience they have, and I don't think selling content on the iPad is the answer." The same theory can be applied to commerce companies, that is, building legitimate content to keep audiences interested, Lerer says.
Unemployment reaches lowest levels in three years. Even with severe weather and snowstorms causing temporary layoffs over the last month, unemployment levels continue to steadily decrease. The New York Times reports unemployment applications sunk to their lowest point since July 2008. Unemployment applications currently stand at about 383,000, significantly lower than the recession's low point in March 2009, when applications peaked at 651,000. According to the U.S. Department of Labor, unemployment applications are a good barometer of companies' willingness to hire, but applications would need to sit consistently below 375,000 to indicate a significant decline in the unemployment rate. Nearly 14 million people remain out of work, and 9.4 million people continue to receive unemployment aid.
Maybe the clothes do make the business woman. Months ago, the media had a field day after Swiss Bank UBS AG crafted a detailed 43-page employee code instructing staff members on how to "dress to impress." Now, Harvard Business Review reports that the Center for Work-Life Policy has produced new research showing that the Swiss bank wasn't too far off by suggesting a dress code for women. After surveying over a thousand males and females working in corporate America, more than half of the women agreed that not only does a woman in a high position need to dress conservatively, but that clothing and success go hand-in-hand. The question is who's responsible for providing business women with "constructive feedback" on what to wear and how to wear it. Perhaps their male colleagues? Yeah, right.
From penalty box to corporate suite. It's an unspoken truth: professional athlete entrepreneurs are usually just glorified spokespeople. But today's OPEN Forum has the story of Zenon Konopka, a center for the New York Islanders, who, according to the story, is as passionate about his two businesses, Prime Wine Products and Pure Press Oil, as he is about hockey. As one colleague tells OPEN Forum, "He calls before his pregame naps to talk business, and he texts me at two in the morning with ideas. If he didn't put money in, I would have paid him to be a part of this." Konopka first learned about business as a kid growing up in Ontario, selling produce at a local market, and later, buying a local pub with his family. Now, Konopka is hoping to keep the tradition of running a family business alive. He tells OPEN Forum, "I want to build a business big enough and profitable enough that I have the luxury to have my friends and family involved in the business, working in the business, and able to grow with the business."
BBC's unnoffical archivist. In a effort save money, the BBC announced a couple of months ago that it has plans to cut 172 websites. But fear not. An anonymous good samaritan has taken the time to archive the doomed sites in a BitTorrent file for public access. The cost for copying, archiving, and redistributing the online content from all 172 websites? A mere $3.99. "The purpose of this project is to show how the entire 172 public facing websites that are earmarked for deletion have been copied, archived, distributed and republished online - independently - for the price of a cup of Starbucks coffee," according to the anonymous archivist.
More from Inc.magazine:
Get this delivered to your inbox.
Follow us on Twitter.
Follow us on Tumblr.
Like us on Facebook.
Matt Yglesias of the Center for
American Progress Action Fund
ponders the logical endpoint of Milton Friedman’s famous
declaration that “the social responsibility of business is to
increase its profit.”
This implies that a business executive has not only the right as
a citizen of a democratic country but amoral obligation to dedicate
his energy and that of the firm he manages toward erecting
regulatory barriers to competition and to begging for bailouts and
subsidies. The Friedman view is that an entrepreneur who’s obsessed
with creating great products is not just in some loose sense a
sucker compared to the one who’s more focused on creating a
politically entrenched monopoly, but that he’s also guilty of some
kind of ethical failing.
Yglesias suggests that, in the end, Friedman’s notion that
profit is the goal is effectively a “social responsibility to
rent-seek.” I'm not so sure, for a couple of reasons.
The first—one espoused by any number of free-market business
owners—is that most folks who subscribe to a basically Friedmanite
view of the world also believe that the short- and medium-term
profits earned through rent-seeking tend to come at the expense of
a firm’s long-term profits and sustainability. Perhaps a firm
initially makes some money by lobbying for taxes and regulations
that push smaller firms out of the market. But in the long run,
those profits are the products of market distortions, and thus not
healthy for the firm, which becomes increasingly reliant on
favoritism and intervention rather than price signals over time.
That sort of rent-seeking behavior also encourages a competitive
regulatory environment, in which other firms and interested parties
(bureaucrats, special interest groups, politicians, etc.) will soon
seek to use similar tactics against your firm. Eventually those
parties will be successful. The underlying idea behind this view is
that it’s bad business to work toward making rent-seeking a greater
part of the regulatory environment.
The second thing to note is that Yglesias is at least partially
right in that many businesses
do end up accepting and embracing the notion that
rent-seeking is simply part of their business. But if you think
this is a problem, then the most effective response is to look for
ways to make rent-seeking behavior more difficult. And since one of
the basic premises when it comes to rent-seeking is that rules and
regulations will almost always be gamed in favor of one party or
another, and that more rules leads to more gaming, you don’t
accomplish this through regulation. Instead, you make rent-seeking
harder by making government smaller, and simpler, and less
powerful, and therefore 1) harder to manipulate and 2) less
enticing, thanks to the limits on its influence, to those looking
to exploit its rules. The less advantageous it is to game the
government, the fewer businesses will attempt to do it.
In 2005, Reason
hosted a debate over the meaning of corporate social
responsibility between Milton Friedman, Whole Foods' John Mackey,
and Cypress Semiconductor's T.J. Rodgers.
Source: http://removeripoffreports.net/ corporate Reputation Management
Fix your company's bad reputation today!
No comments:
Post a Comment